[Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: Aggregation and conclusion

Dmitry Bigunyak icestar at inbox.ru
Sun Oct 30 20:42:58 GMT 2016


>Given that there was no formal vote, I think this is a somewhat hasty
>and unfair conclusion. It's a bit like having an election with only one
>party, having people vote, and then mentioning a second party later
>once the election's finished. I personally was just about to vote in
>favour of the "governance+core team" proposal, when I went through all
>the emails and came to the second conclusion.
>
>Personally I would like to see a straightforward "A vs B" vote. Only
>then will I consider this a fair decision.
>
>Andy

Heh, I'm actually totally agree with that.
I was silently following the discussion and never had the feeling that all this time there was a voting process going on...
Matt, David, sorry guys, but it all feels like you just using the community to do what we've already decided to do.

--
Dmitry
e-mail: icestar at inbox.ru


More information about the DBIx-Class mailing list