[Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: Aggregation and conclusion

[James E Keenan]

On 10/31/2016 07:22 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:43:31 Matt S Trout <mst at shadowcat.co.uk> wrote:
>> Otherwise, I would suggest that you turn your plan into a full
>> proposal,
>
> TBH, I didn't even realise I was making a proposal until I saw the
> results[1]. I was merely bringing up one of Dave's earlier
> suggestions[2], which several others also seemed to like.
>
> But, in that case, I propose:
>
> - RIBASUSHI retains the current namespace, continuing to maintain and
> tighten that code base. The aim would be a rock-solid module with a
> very conservative rate of change and new features.
>
> - A new namespace DBIx::Class2 is created, owned and operated by MST's
> governance+core team proposal. Developers that want to create new
> features do so in this namespace.
>
> I do not understand the technicalities, but from what I have seen
> discussed, people would still be able to use DBIx::Class::* modules in
> both namespaces.
>

-1 on this proposal from me.  I favor getting on with the existing proposal.

Thank you very much.
Jim Keenan