<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 6:59 AM, John SJ Anderson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:genehack@genehack.org" target="_blank">genehack@genehack.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
</span>Could you please turn on issue submission (it seems to be disabled at the moment<div style="font-size:small;display:inline" class="gmail_default">)</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default">Why? <a href="http://rt.cpan.org">rt.cpan.org</a> is better:</div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default">1. that's where all the existing bugs are, so to start creating new issues in a new location is confusing and disruptive,<br></div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default">2. creating an issue on github requires one to register an account there, which some perl users have clearly stated they do not want to do,</div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default">3. it is not possible to move github issues between queues, whereas RT supports this as a core feature,</div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default">4. <a href="http://rt.cpan.org">rt.cpan.org</a> supports linking to <a href="http://rt.perl.org">rt.perl.org</a> issues and vice versa.</div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default">I use github issues when I have to, but when I have a choice, I *always* choose RT, even for distributions that I author and maintain solely on my own.</div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default">But regardless of what is chosen, absolutely the canonical repository and bug queue should be indicated in metadata so metacpan can provide the appropriate links.<br></div></div></div></div>