[epo-core] What are we going to -do- with this non-profit we have,
anyway?
Matt S Trout
mst at shadowcat.co.uk
Wed Jul 30 10:25:45 BST 2008
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:18:17AM +0100, Mike Whitaker wrote:
> Is peregrin on this list?
This is the core list, so no. He probably could be though, we've let
a couple of the rabble in already :)
> >Somebody (I'll try to have a play with this, but anybody else
> >interested
> >should too) should start learning Perl::Critic policy writing as
> >well. I
> >want an enperl coding standard that can be shared across the
> >community;
> >the closest we currently have now is DBP and I Am Not Happy With That.
>
> Module::Starter::EnPerl as well? :)
That would be good, yes.
Huh. things to sponsor: some SODDING DOCUMENTATION FOR MODULE::INSTALL
> While we're at it...
>
> Books.
>
> The non-online and active part of the Perl community learns its Perl
> from books.
And perl.com - which is why we really need to engage there even with its
disadvantages.
I read a lot more perl.com than I did books in my early days.
> They therefore think the Llama and the Camel are the bible, and if
> you're very lucky, they believe in PBP and perhaps Conway's OO book.
> If miracles happen, they read the testing notebook!
Ha. I didn't. learned out of Learning+Programming+Cookbook and then the
rest came from perldocs, perl.com and perldesignpatterns.com - the latter
of which isn't pimped nearly enough.
> To engage them, which I suspect represents a sizeable percentage of
> Perl programmers, we need better books that embrace $extended_core
> and writing modern Perl.
I was trying to discuss with with ORLY but not getting much of anywhere.
Somebody else should prod chromatic about this; I'm now likely tied up
doing another cat tome with kd.
> Question, though: what percentage of Perl programmers DO we think
> that is? It's pretty much 80% of my team, as a very small sample - if
> it wasn't for my every-Friday 'cool modern Perl' presentations,
> they'd still think Class::Std was cutting edge.
The "perl community" as we know and interact with it is an echo chamber.
Which reminds me, we should make sure any article published about a dist
is linked strongly in the POD for that dist if possible - perl.com and
search.cpan.org will be our two key ways of establishing visibility online
so we -must- get the backlinks in.
I also think we need an ASCII mail sig button that'll show up on list
archives (quite a bit of SC's business comes from my .sig). See below for
a sketch at it. (or possibly a series of JAEPHs :)
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform?
[ I write http://enlightenedperl.org/ ] http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/
More information about the epo-core
mailing list