[Epo-marketing] How to refer to EPO

[J. Shirley]

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Mike Whitaker <epo at altrion.org> wrote:
> OK. Having written it and seen it written so many different ways it's
> starting to drive me batshit, let's try and standardise.
>
> I propose that the following are all equally valid means of referring to our
> organization, in descending order of formality:
>
> The Enlightened Perl Organization
> Enlightened Perl
> EPO
>
> Sadly, much as mst loves it, I'm moving to shed 'enperl' as a possible.
>
> Reasoned discussion and viable alternatives considered, but let's try and
> get this nailed by the end of today if possible.

I say it in this order:
 - EPO
 - Enlightened Perl Organi[zs]ation

I try to refrain from saying Enlightened Perl (as that sounds more
like a product or a subset) and enperl is meaningful only in the echo
chamber.

My vote for the official reference is EPO.