[Handel] Latest dev release failing tests

[Jamie Neil]

Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>> Class::Accessor::Grouped is 0.05000
>>
> 
> Upgrade to CAG 0.05001
> 0.05000 has a new set_component_class for DBIC, but it's not friendly to
>  compose_namespace..

Just doing that now - I guess it hadn't hit the mirror yesterday. :)

Lots of warnings now about uninitialised values, but all the strict 
errors seem to be gone.

It's only failing on three tests now:

t/checkout_process........................Use of uninitialized value in 
hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Class/Inspector.pm line 209.
Use of uninitialized value in hash element at 
/usr/share/perl5/Class/Inspector.pm line 209.

#   Failed test 'first name unchanged'
#   in t/checkout_process.t at line 281.
#          got: 'ErrorBillToFirstName'
#     expected: 'BillToFirstName'

#   Failed test 'last name unchanged'
#   in t/checkout_process.t at line 282.
#          got: 'ErrorBillToLastName'
#     expected: 'BillToLastName'

#   Failed test 'subtotal is 0'
#   in t/checkout_process.t at line 285.
#          got: '5.55'
#     expected: '0'

[snip]

t/compat_order_new........................
#   Failed test in t/compat_order_new.t at line 59.
#                   'Use of uninitialized value in hash element at 
/usr/share/perl5/Class/Inspector.pm line 209.
# '
#     doesn't match '(?-xism:deprecated)'

#   Failed test in t/compat_order_new.t at line 59.
#                   'Use of uninitialized value in hash element at 
/usr/share/perl5/Class/Inspector.pm line 209.
# '
#     doesn't match '(?-xism:deprecated)'

#   Failed test in t/compat_order_new.t at line 59.
#                   'Use of uninitialized value in hash element at 
/usr/share/perl5/Class/Inspector.pm line 209.
# '
#     doesn't match '(?-xism:deprecated)'

#   Failed test in t/compat_order_new.t at line 59.
#                   'Use of uninitialized value in hash element at 
/usr/share/perl5/Class/Inspector.pm line 209.
# '
#     doesn't match '(?-xism:deprecated)'

[snip]

t/l10n_lexicon_synced.....................
#   Failed test 'Handel::L10N::zh_tw has differing number of entries'
#   in t/l10n_lexicon_synced.t at line 39.
#          got: '65'
#     expected: '27'

#   Failed test 'No entry found for ORDER_CREATE_FAILED_CART_EMPTY in 
Handel::L10N::zh_tw'
#   in t/l10n_lexicon_synced.t at line 44.

#   Failed test 'No entry found for CONSTANT_EXISTS_IN_CALLER in 
Handel::L10N::zh_tw'
#   in t/l10n_lexicon_synced.t at line 44.

#   Failed test 'No entry found for NO_RESULT_CLASS in Handel::L10N::zh_tw'
#   in t/l10n_lexicon_synced.t at line 44.

#   Failed test 'No entry found for PARAM1_NOT_HASH_CARTITEM_ORDERITEM 
in Handel::L10N::zh_tw'
#   in t/l10n_lexicon_synced.t at line 44.

#   Failed test 'No entry found for COLUMN_NOT_SPECIFIED in 
Handel::L10N::zh_tw'
#   in t/l10n_lexicon_synced.t at line 44.

[snip]

Should these tests pass?

After forcing the install everything looks ok now.

Many thanks.

-- 
Jamie Neil | <jamie at versado.net> | 0870 7777 454
Versado I.T. Services Ltd. | http://versado.net/ | 0845 450 1254