On of the biggest issues I'm seeing from reviewing perl sites (other than how ugly they look) is that so many of them are just the documentation put into a webpage or long lists of things. <br><br>Documentation is usually written as a reference guide so something, not an introduction, and so it really does not come across well on a web page.<br>
<br>Long lists are also not conducive to being read!<br><br>From looking around more there seem to be a half dozen seperate sites using subdomains...<br><br><a href="http://learn.perl.org">learn.perl.org</a><br><a href="http://history.perl.org">history.perl.org</a><br>
<a href="http://faq.perl.org">faq.perl.org</a><br><a href="http://dbi.perl.org">dbi.perl.org</a><br><br>I suggest these should be redirected to:<br><br><a href="http://www.perl.org/learn">www.perl.org/learn</a><br>
<a href="http://www.perl.org/history">www.perl.org/history</a><br>
<a href="http://www.perl.org/faq">www.perl.org/faq</a><br>
<a href="http://www.perl.org/dbi">www.perl.org/dbi</a><br><br>Interestingly, nothing has happened in perl since 2002:<br><a href="http://history.perl.org/PerlTimeline.html#2000s">http://history.perl.org/PerlTimeline.html#2000s</a><br>
<br>There is also a complete mix of links to various other sites on the bottom of most pages, this means you end up bouncing from one perl site to another and getting quite disorientated. This is probably is a bigger issue, but just something I noticed.<br>
<br>Anyway, I'll wait until svn access then can actually get on with somestuff!<br><br>Leo<br>