[Catalyst] A different approach to static content

Wade.Stuart at fallon.com Wade.Stuart at fallon.com
Tue Aug 16 20:28:21 CEST 2005





I guess I may be missing the point but why not serve the static files
outside of the mod_perl/catalyst owned url space and be done with it.

-Wade


catalyst-bounces at lists.rawmode.org wrote on 08/16/2005 01:19:27 PM:

> Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 14:08 -0400, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> >
> >>No, but it still requires every request to go through Catalyst right?
> >>That's the other gripe.
> >
> >
> > It does, at least far enough for Cat to determine that it doesn't
handle
> > this URL.
> >
> >
> >>It's not more different than if I took every url I wanted to use in
> >>Catalyst and manually created <Location>/<LocatationMatch> blocks in
> >>httpd.conf and set-handler on them. I'm just suggestion that with a
> >>custom engine we could take the work out of it; just like using perl to

> >>auto config 1000 virtual servers in httpd.conf.
> >
> >
> > Maybe I'm being too pessimistic about the difficulty of it.  Go ahead
> > and give it a try.
> >
> > - Perrin
> >
> >
>
> And maybe I'm just being a pain in the a** pot stirrer today.
> Maybe it's time for some Yukon Jack and a chill pill. :-)
>
> -=Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Catalyst mailing list
> Catalyst at lists.rawmode.org
> http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst




More information about the Catalyst mailing list