[Catalyst] 'might have' relationships?

[Matt S Trout]

On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 07:38:10PM -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> Am 20.06.2005 um 00:55 schrieb James Tolley:
> 
> >Also, unless I missed
> >something, it doesn't handle might_have or many-to-many mapping
> >relationships. Are there plans to handle these issues?
> 
> What is a "might have" relationship (*)?  I'm not familiar with the  
> term, and Google is not finding anything on it.

c.f. "perldoc Class::DBI" and "perldoc Class::DBI::Relationship::MightHave"

ActiveRecord calls it "belongs_to", I believe.

-- 
     Matt S Trout           Website: http://www.shadowcatsystems.co.uk
  Technical Director        E-mail:  mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk
Shadowcat Systems Ltd.