[Catalyst] 'might have' relationships?

[Jesse Sheidlower]

On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 07:38:10PM -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> Am 20.06.2005 um 00:55 schrieb James Tolley:
> 
> >Also, unless I missed
> >something, it doesn't handle might_have or many-to-many mapping
> >relationships. Are there plans to handle these issues?
> 
> What is a "might have" relationship (*)?  I'm not familiar with the  
> term, and Google is not finding anything on it.

http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-DBI/lib/Class/DBI.pm#might_have

Best,

Jesse Sheidlower