[Catalyst] Why Catalyst instead of Ruby on Rails?

Sebastian Riedel sri at oook.de
Sat Nov 12 04:23:42 CET 2005


Am 12.11.2005 um 03:05 schrieb Ovid:
> Incidentally, I've also noticed that Catalyst seems much more
> responsive this time around than when I tried it after the MiniMojo
> perl.com article (or is it just the AJAX which is faster?)

Which versions?
Catalyst itself has always been very fast, but there were some keep- 
alive/HTTP::Daemon related problems with the old test-server, if i  
remember right.


--
sebastian




More information about the Catalyst mailing list