[Catalyst] Why Catalyst instead of Ruby on Rails?

[John Siracusa]

On 11/11/05 11:55 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> The Rails plural table-naming convention does seem like one of the
> stranger decisions in Rails.  It flies in the face of every schema I've
> ever worked with.

I always use plural table names and singular class names, but I agree that
it's pretty draconian to make this convention a mandatory part of a
framework.

-John