[Catalyst] Engine::AJP or Engine::WARP

[Michael Alan Dorman]

Andrew Libby <andrew.libby at gmail.com> writes:
> Anyone ever given thought to doing this?  I'm wondering what the
> tradeoffs would be for this over the current approach.  The main
> thing I'm thinking is that it'd be very nice for keeping perl out of
> apache, if that's attractive.  Is that attractive?  Just sort of
> thinking out loud this morning.

I would think SCGI would be an easier option, given that there's
already a perl module for handling the protocol.  I've even got a
half-finished Engine::SCGI that does everything but handle POST
arguments.

Mike
-- 
No marigolds in the promised land -- Steely Dan, "King Of The World