[Catalyst] Engine::AJP or Engine::WARP

Andrew Libby andrew.libby at gmail.com
Wed Feb 8 18:23:00 CET 2006


Michael Alan Dorman wrote:

>I would think SCGI would be an easier option, given that there's
>already a perl module for handling the protocol.  I've even got a
>half-finished Engine::SCGI that does everything but handle POST
>arguments.
>
>Mike
>  
>
Hi Mike,

How mature is the apache module side of this?  This looks very
interesting.  I'm attracted to
the idea of not having perl run within Apache. 

Andy

-- 
Andrew Libby                                  
alibby at philadelphiariders.com
http://philadelphiariders.com/
Motorcycle Enthusiasm, Fishtown Style

1999 SV650
1999 Laverda 750S
1996 BMWR1100RS
1981 Moto Guzzi CX100 (in Lemans I clothing)





More information about the Catalyst mailing list