[Catalyst] Engine::AJP or Engine::WARP
    Andrew Libby 
    andrew.libby at gmail.com
       
    Wed Feb  8 18:23:00 CET 2006
    
    
  
Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
>I would think SCGI would be an easier option, given that there's
>already a perl module for handling the protocol.  I've even got a
>half-finished Engine::SCGI that does everything but handle POST
>arguments.
>
>Mike
>  
>
Hi Mike,
How mature is the apache module side of this?  This looks very
interesting.  I'm attracted to
the idea of not having perl run within Apache. 
Andy
-- 
Andrew Libby                                  
alibby at philadelphiariders.com
http://philadelphiariders.com/
Motorcycle Enthusiasm, Fishtown Style
1999 SV650
1999 Laverda 750S
1996 BMWR1100RS
1981 Moto Guzzi CX100 (in Lemans I clothing)
    
    
More information about the Catalyst
mailing list