[Catalyst] Engine::AJP or Engine::WARP
Andrew Libby
andrew.libby at gmail.com
Wed Feb 8 18:23:00 CET 2006
Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
>I would think SCGI would be an easier option, given that there's
>already a perl module for handling the protocol. I've even got a
>half-finished Engine::SCGI that does everything but handle POST
>arguments.
>
>Mike
>
>
Hi Mike,
How mature is the apache module side of this? This looks very
interesting. I'm attracted to
the idea of not having perl run within Apache.
Andy
--
Andrew Libby
alibby at philadelphiariders.com
http://philadelphiariders.com/
Motorcycle Enthusiasm, Fishtown Style
1999 SV650
1999 Laverda 750S
1996 BMWR1100RS
1981 Moto Guzzi CX100 (in Lemans I clothing)
More information about the Catalyst
mailing list