[Catalyst] RE: Catalyst Digest, Vol 11, Issue 90
robert.l.hicks at uscg.mil
Thu Jan 26 15:56:57 CET 2006
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:26:30 +0100
> From: Sebastian Riedel <sri at oook.de>
> Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Config for Catalyst
> To: The elegant MVC web framework <catalyst at lists.rawmode.org>
> Message-ID: <70DD53D6-EA2B-44D4-9C7A-3DA3A7947058 at oook.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
> 26.01.2006 14:23 Hicks, Robert:
> > Since TT uses AppConfig I would vote for that one since it would
> > remove
> > a module dependency (YAML + Spiffy) and it is already needed by TT
> > anyway.
> > That should be a consideration when you are building on "best of
> > breed"
> > tools. "What are they using already". Too many dependencies can be
> > a bad
> > thing IMO.
> Have you looked at our current dependencies? :)
> Btw. Recent tests showed that installing Catalyst (with prereqs) on a
> vanilla unix using CPANPLUS works flawless without a single failure!
Vanilla Unix means nothing to me. I am on Windows boxes most of the
time. I was actually thinking something else when I wrote dependencies.
What I meant was why "another" config format when TT already uses
AppConfig and so you can get rid of the YAML issue altogether.
More information about the Catalyst