[BULK] - RE: [Catalyst] A Perl Message Queue?

Mesdaq, Ali amesdaq at websense.com
Fri Aug 24 03:00:24 GMT 2007


This looks very interesting and promising but is it just me or is there
No actual documentation on using Perl bindings?

Thanks,
------------------------------------------
Ali Mesdaq
Security Researcher II
Websense Security Labs
http://www.WebsenseSecurityLabs.com
------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Mah [mailto:rmah at pobox.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 5:57 PM
To: 'The elegant MVC web framework'
Subject: [BULK] - RE: [Catalyst] A Perl Message Queue?

Good message queue systems can exceed 100,000 messages per second in
throughput.  They say OpenAMQ does, for example.

 

I suggest looking at OpenAMQ (openamq.org).  It is free (GNU license),
supported and used by major companies for $$$ work, looks well designed,
seems very flexible, has great performance, and, most importantly, has
perl bindings.

 

Another popular free message queue is ActiveMQ.  Only downside to it is
that it seems rather geared towards java and it's JMS philosophy (though
perl bindings are available).

 

Cheers,
Rob

________________________________

From: J. Shirley [mailto:jshirley at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 1:54 PM
To: The elegant MVC web framework
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] A Perl Message Queue?

 

On 8/23/07, Tobias Kremer <list at funkreich.de> wrote:

	> Has anyone seen stuff like a Messages Queue (I dont have other
words for
	> it) But a more generic implementation of a thing where you can
put in
	> messages and  pick them out in some other part of the program.

	>
	> It would be nice when you have stuff that takes longer that
people usually
	> can wait for.
	
	Maybe TheSchwartz does what you want:
	
	http://search.cpan.org/dist/TheSchwartz/ 
	
	--Tobias
	
	_______________________________________________
	List: Catalyst at lists.rawmode.org
	Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
	Searchable archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
	Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/



I second using TheSchwartz -- 6a/TypePad had a presentation at OSCON on
it, reporting that they were having throughput of 800 messages per
second. 

We're using it at my job, and loving it.  I wrote out the very high
level "experience" at
http://jshirley.vox.com/library/post/catalyst-and-theschwartz-reliable-j
obqueue-in-a-great-framework.html

Also, you can look at Gearman.

Hope this helps,
-Jay

--
J. Shirley :: jshirley at gmail.com :: Killing two stones with one bird...
http://www.toeat.com 




More information about the Catalyst mailing list