[Catalyst] [OT] what would constitute a sensible set of benchmarks?

[Daniel McBrearty]

maybe. for such an exercise though, you would have to trust the
implementors of submission to use the best tools available for that
framework, and to use them well.

I wouldn't see much point to trying to do something like this without
having some tests that take a look at how well db access is performed.


On 1/15/07, Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek <rs at 474.at> wrote:
> Daniel McBrearty wrote:
>
> >> Personally, I don't care about templating and ORM benchmarks,
> >
> > why not?
>
> Well, templating benchmarks maybe, but for an ORM I just have the
> feeling the larger factor is how you use it, not which.
>
> --
> # Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek
> # Perl 5/Catalyst Developer in Hamburg, Germany
> { EMail => ' rs at 474.at ', Web => ' http://474.at ' }
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: Catalyst at lists.rawmode.org
> Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
>


-- 
Daniel McBrearty
email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer
BTW : 0873928131