[Catalyst] Catalyst vs Rails vs Django Cook off
danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
Tue Jan 16 14:25:51 GMT 2007
I looked for that discussion - didn't find it. Do you have a pointer?
In your experience, what is accounting for the other 99.9% fo runtime?
Db access? templates? other?
On 1/16/07, Matt S Trout <dbix-class at trout.me.uk> wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2007, at 15:26, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Here is ablog I just found. Is it true that Catalyst is so slow
> > comparing with other frameworks?
> > http://letsgetdugg.com/category/rails
> Is it true that for incredibly trivial applications Catalyst might
> serve less rps? Yes.
> Have I ever seen a real-world scenario where the things this
> benchmarks account for more than 0.1% of runtime? No.
> We discussed this. Re-read the old discussion. Thread over :)
> Matt S Trout, Technical Director, Shadowcat Systems Ltd.
> Offering custom development, consultancy and support contracts for
> DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for
> + Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-
> class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +
> List: Catalyst at lists.rawmode.org
> Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive: http://firstname.lastname@example.org/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer
BTW : 0873928131
More information about the Catalyst