[Catalyst] Creating Good Adaptor or Bridge Models (WAS: Creating
a thin Model)
Matt S Trout
dbix-class at trout.me.uk
Wed May 23 15:17:39 GMT 2007
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:16:38AM +0000, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> Some time ago I had this idea that the declarations we put into
> MySite::Model::DBIC are entirely superfluous and that it would be much
> simpler if we just needed to declare in the config file that the model
> uses the MySite::Schema and have it generated automatically. Matt
> agreed and asked me to write tests for that feature - but I did not
> know what should go into these tests.
>
> So the idea is to be able to declare in the config file:
>
> Model::ModelName :
> instantiate : MySite::Schema
>
> and then use $c->model(ModelName) without actually creating the
> MySite::Model::ModelName package anywhere.
Maybe something more like
setup_components:
Model::ModelName:
class: Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema
instantiate:
schema_class: My::Schema
connect_info: ....
?
> So what are the tests that would go here? I can think only about two:
>
> - that $c->model(ModelName) is a Catalyst::Model
That shouldn't even be required, an instantiate section in the config could
indicate calling ->COMPONENT if present and ->new if not, and the lack of
one would mean simply adding the class maybe?
> - that the config values are correctly used
>
> Is there anything more? This would automate what you put in the
> first, simpler method of model building.
How does the above sound?
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director Want a managed development or deployment platform?
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a quote
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
More information about the Catalyst
mailing list