[Catalyst] The performance test of 6 leading frameworks

Andy Grundman andy at hybridized.org
Fri Feb 29 17:17:45 GMT 2008


On Feb 29, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Andy Grundman wrote:

>
> On Feb 29, 2008, at 11:21 AM, dab at free.fr wrote:
>
>> hi
>> I do not know if this test has already been posted on the list
>> Why these bad performances ?
>> http://www.alrond.com/en/2007/jan/25/performance-test-of-6-leading-frameworks/
>
>
> All in all seems like a well-done benchmark with lots of good data.
>
> Note he is benchmarking TT performance as well.  Although I guess he  
> is benchmarking everyone else's template libraries too.  To  
> benchmark the framework itself, you should just send some static  
> data.  I think with 5 FastCGI procs he should get more requests per  
> second though.  I'm not familiar with nginx to know if that has  
> something to do with the numbers.  Will be worth benchmarking it  
> with lighttpd as well.
>
> Another interesting thing is in the hello.tt file he is not using a  
> variable for the 'hello' string like he did in most other  
> frameworks.  Wouldn't help performance, though.  Also don't know if  
> he's using Template::Stash::XS or template caching, since these are  
> not enabled by default in View::TT.
>
> I'll see about posting some benchmarks of our various engines with  
> this same test data, including a fast new engine I'm working on. :)

Heh, I didn't realize how old this was... still, I think we could use  
a good list of benchmarks for various engines.



More information about the Catalyst mailing list