[Catalyst] Re: Request paths - rejoining Chained actions together.

[Aristotle Pagaltzis]

* Tomas Doran <bobtfish at bobtfish.net> [2008-05-10 09:25]:
> If I was to hack some code (and tests) up which supported my
> originally suggested syntax ( Chained('sub1', 'sub2') for
> joining chains), what would anyone feel about it?

You could no longer make `uri_for` work in the general case if
you did that.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>