[Catalyst] Re: Request paths - rejoining Chained actions together.

[Tomas Doran]

On 10 May 2008, at 15:26, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:

> * Tomas Doran <bobtfish at bobtfish.net> [2008-05-10 09:25]:
>> If I was to hack some code (and tests) up which supported my
>> originally suggested syntax ( Chained('sub1', 'sub2') for
>> joining chains), what would anyone feel about it?
>
> You could no longer make `uri_for` work in the general case if
> you did that.

Aha! I had a feeling the reason that someone didn't do that already  
is that there was a compelling reason to not do so - I just hadn't  
thought about it hard enough..

I'll shut up and go away now, thanks guys :)

t0m