[Catalyst] Mason + DBI + Catalyst?

[Daniel Carrera]

Hans Dieter Pearcey wrote:
> Ew.  If the OP is used to non-trivial Mason -- autohandlers, subcomponents,
> methods, etc., all things that are reasonable as part of a templating engine
> (i.e. not web framework-related) -- MicroMason isn't really going to be
> satisfactory.

Hmm...  While I'm not used to anything about Mason in particular, I do 
expect certain features in a templating engine. If "subcomonents" refers 
to the ability to insert one component inside another, then that's a 
must-have feature. I can't imagine making an interesting website without 
that.

Daniel.