[Catalyst] Catalyst benchmark 5.7 vs 5.8 - new test

[Tomas Doran]

Toby Corkindale wrote:
> It's interesting to note the headline figures have 5.71 performing 316 
> tps, vs 5.80 making only 283 tps.

The very important thing you haven't noted (unless I missed it) is what 
perl version this benchmark was conducted under.

Some benchmarking was done before 5.8 was released, and it showed that 
Catalyst 5.7 was (marginally) quicker on perl 5.8 and that Catalyst 5.8 
was (marginally) quicker on perl 5.10 :)

So I'd be very interested to see the benchmark repeated with two 
different perls, giving 4 results to compare and contrast.

Cheers
t0m