[Catalyst] Catalyst benchmark 5.7 vs 5.8 - new test

Oleg Pronin syber.rus at gmail.com
Tue Sep 29 21:12:39 GMT 2009


5.8  !!TWICE!! slower at startup than 5.7 under any perl version. This
is annoying because i have 100 models and i do not want to wait 10
secs while it is starting in debug.

2009/9/29 Tomas Doran <bobtfish at bobtfish.net>:
> Toby Corkindale wrote:
>>
>> It's interesting to note the headline figures have 5.71 performing 316
>> tps, vs 5.80 making only 283 tps.
>
> The very important thing you haven't noted (unless I missed it) is what perl
> version this benchmark was conducted under.
>
> Some benchmarking was done before 5.8 was released, and it showed that
> Catalyst 5.7 was (marginally) quicker on perl 5.8 and that Catalyst 5.8 was
> (marginally) quicker on perl 5.10 :)
>
> So I'd be very interested to see the benchmark repeated with two different
> perls, giving 4 results to compare and contrast.
>
> Cheers
> t0m
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: Catalyst at lists.scsys.co.uk
> Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
>



More information about the Catalyst mailing list