[Catalyst] Log::Log4perl::Catalyst or Catalyst::Log::Log4perl ?

[J. Shirley]

On Jun 13, 2010, at 3:56 AM, Christiaan Kras wrote:

> Thanks. He suggests Catalyst::Log::Log4perl.
> I guess I'll try both Catalyst::Log::Log4perl and Log::Log4perl::Catalyst then.
> 
> Christiaan Kras

The cspec issues can (in most cases) be safely ignored.

If you do encounter any issues with using it, please let me know what they are and I'll work towards getting them fixed up.

It does, however, look like the autoflush issue needs to be resolved.  I'll see if I can get the tuits to chase that down next week.

Thanks,
-Jay