[Catalyst] Question about Chained Controller

[Charlie Garrison]

Good morning,

On 15/11/10 at 10:49 PM -0200, Eden Cardim 
<edencardim at gmail.com> wrote:

>When your requirements pile up, auto is going to become a big block of
>monolithic code, and your methods are going to have enormous sequences of
>attributes. Plus, I find it more logical to have the checking code
>closer to where it's required, as opposed to having to maintain the
>attributes scattered around the app then locate and edit the related
>code in auto.

Thanks for the feedback. That's sort-of how I originally was 
coding it, but I had duplicated code for base and base_auth 
chained actions; that didn't seem right either. I was still 
pretty steep on the learning curve at that point. I'll go back 
and re-think some of my design decisions.

Thanks again for the clarification.


Charlie

-- 
    Ꮚ Charlie Garrison ♊ <garrison at zeta.org.au>

O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
〠  http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt