darren at darrenduncan.net
Sun Aug 19 05:20:24 GMT 2012
jmo mlists wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Ian Docherty <catalyst at iandocherty.com> wrote:
> It's 'normal' not to create Catalyst specific models, but to create
> your model outside of Catalyst (so you can use it in things like cron
> jobs for example) in which case you just use a thin adaptor class. See
> If you do it that way you don't need to publish a cpan module at all.
> - icydee
> Was that for me or Gianni?
> I wasn't aware of Catalyst::Model::Adaptor, seems like a useful module.
> What is the general take on modules such as
> Catalyst::Model::WebService::Solr if it's 'normal' to use C::M::Adaptor?
> Isn't that pretty much the same as I was suggesting for RabbitMQ? Is it
> thought of as depricated?
Modules that don't use Catalyst::Model::Adaptor are either legacy modules doing
things the hard way or they have very special needs. You should use
Catalyst::Model::Adaptor even if you see other examples that don't. -- Darren Duncan
More information about the Catalyst