[Catalyst] Catalyst::Model::RabbitMQ

[Darren Duncan]

jmo mlists wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Ian Docherty <catalyst at iandocherty.com> wrote:
> 
>     It's 'normal' not to create Catalyst specific models, but to create
>     your model outside of Catalyst (so you can use it in things like cron
>     jobs for example) in which case you just use a thin adaptor class. See
>     Catalyst::Model::Adaptor
> 
>     If you do it that way you don't need to publish a cpan module at all.
> 
>     - icydee
> 
> Was that for me or Gianni?
> 
> I wasn't aware of  Catalyst::Model::Adaptor, seems like a useful module. 
> What is the general take on modules such as 
> Catalyst::Model::WebService::Solr if it's 'normal' to use C::M::Adaptor? 
> Isn't that pretty much the same as I was suggesting for RabbitMQ? Is it 
> thought of as depricated?
> 
> /Jon

Modules that don't use Catalyst::Model::Adaptor are either legacy modules doing 
things the hard way or they have very special needs.  You should use 
Catalyst::Model::Adaptor even if you see other examples that don't. -- Darren Duncan