[DBD-SQLite] Removing the on-by-default referential integrity.

[Kenichi Ishigaki]

OK. Agreed.

Kenichi

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:28:59 -0800, Darren Duncan <darren at darrenduncan.net> wrote:

>Kenichi Ishigaki wrote:
>> Our tests are hardly thorough and complete, and while I tried
>> to write a test for foreign keys, I was hit by a weird bug
>> that suggested the internal sqlite3 object and the DBI/DBD::SQLite
>> handle objects were holding different statuses; the same statement
>> works fine when issued one by one with do, and fails with consecutive
>> executes. This may not be a showstopper, but is certainly annoying.
>> (I haven't added the test yet, thoguh. I don't want it to be disabled
>> again like the one I added just before 1.26_05).
>> 
>> Anyway, I agree to comment out the pragma to turn off the default
>> foreign keys support tentatively. But I do insist we should wait
>> at least for two weeks, until the sqlite team release the next
>> monthly update.
>
>If you mean we should wait 2 weeks and then issue the 1.27-stable as soon as 
>SQLite 3.6.20 comes out and include that, for the main reason that this would 
>include the first batch of fixes (if any) to SQLite itself following its 
>foreign-keys major update, then that sounds reasonable, so our testers of 
>foreign keys get those fixes.  Especially relevant if the changes to add foreign 
>key enforcement might have broken something unrelated to foreign keys.  But we 
>should wait no longer than 3.6.20 to issue our own stable release.  And our 
>stable would have foreign keys disabled by default. -- Darren Duncan
>
>_______________________________________________
>DBD-SQLite mailing list
>DBD-SQLite at lists.scsys.co.uk
>http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite