[DBIx-Class-Devel] Re: initial diagram

[John SJ Anderson]

Sorry, just caught up on this, I think the final diagram looks good.
It would have been very helpful to me if I could have seen it when I
was starting out with DBIC. 8^)

AFA the issue with 1 and * -- I agree a legend is probably overkill,
but perhaps you could give some graphic indication of the 1:N ones by
adding another box or two at a slight offset, to give a stacked pages
sort of effect? Just a thought.

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:42 PM, fREW Schmidt <frioux at gmail.com> wrote:
> It's standard UML.
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:48:53PM +0100, Alexander Hartmaier wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, fREW Schmidt <frioux at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:49:50PM +0100, Alexander Hartmaier wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:29 PM, fREW Schmidt <frioux at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Updated from riba and castaway's comments.
>> > > >
>> > > > I find the Schema description irritating. 'A collection of ResultSets'
>> > > sounds like a cache to me.
>> > > Isn't it more a collection of ResultSources, the metadata which is used
>> > to
>> > > generate the ResultSet and Result classes from?
>> > (sic)
>> >
>> > Fixed.
>> >
>> Thanks!
>> Regarding the 1's and *'s, I'm not sure people will understand them without
>> a legend or something similiar.
>
> --
> fREW Schmidt
> http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> DBIx-Class-Devel mailing list
> DBIx-Class-Devel at lists.scsys.co.uk
> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class-devel
>