[DBIx-Class-Devel] Re: [dbix-class] better explanation for optional fk values in rels (#37)

[Peter Rabbitson]

The original discussion on this was:
```
<davewood> can the "problem" be simplified to: "if your foreign key column is not nullable you want join_type => left for complex resultsets to work correctly"?
<ribasushi> davewood: itym s/not nullable/nullable/
<ribasushi> and "for relatonship traversal to work consistently in all situations" (nothing complex about the resultset I gave as example)
<ribasushi> davewood: but yes, that'd be much better - convert it to a final patch and show again?
```

The current patch however simply rewords two sentences, while keeping the original confusing semantic structure intact. Is there a reason you didn't go for the much simpler explanation as in the IRC log above?
I could apply the patch as-is, but it imho makes no difference whatsoever wrt the problem you were originally trying to solve.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/dbsrgits/dbix-class/pull/37#issuecomment-31225950
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class-devel/attachments/20131226/f638099f/attachment.htm