[DBIx-Class-Devel] version numbering scheme

[fREW Schmidt]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:58:37PM +1100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:23:47PM +0100, Alexander Hartmaier wrote:
> >
> > I thought some more about what we discussed on IRC and think that we should
> > release the constructor rewrite and the doc improvements together as
> > 1.000000. Than we have a feature that justifies the attention Ribasushi
> > mentioned and the docs are in a better state for attracted new users.
> > The defined version number scheme switch could happen before that or with
> > the 1.000000 release.
>
> I can sort of sign-off on that with one addition: what was talked about
> on IRC *MUST* be codified in some sort of ReleasePolicy.pod or somesuch.
> I know Getty and frew half-volunteered to do it, I just want to
> reiterate this is not an optional nice-to-have. I (and I assume many
> others) do not want to have this utterly non-productive conversation
> ever again - such a document will prevent that.
>
> Cheers
>

Deal.  Though it would be nice to get that doc patch too :)

--
fREW Schmidt
http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class-devel/attachments/20130228/1ab8461e/attachment.pgp