[DBIx-Class-Devel] version numbering scheme

[Peter Rabbitson]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 08:07:34PM -0600, fREW Schmidt wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:58:37PM +1100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:23:47PM +0100, Alexander Hartmaier wrote:
> > >
> > > I thought some more about what we discussed on IRC and think that we should
> > > release the constructor rewrite and the doc improvements together as
> > > 1.000000. Than we have a feature that justifies the attention Ribasushi
> > > mentioned and the docs are in a better state for attracted new users.
> > > The defined version number scheme switch could happen before that or with
> > > the 1.000000 release.
> >
> > I can sort of sign-off on that with one addition: what was talked about
> > on IRC *MUST* be codified in some sort of ReleasePolicy.pod or somesuch.
> > I know Getty and frew half-volunteered to do it, I just want to
> > reiterate this is not an optional nice-to-have. I (and I assume many
> > others) do not want to have this utterly non-productive conversation
> > ever again - such a document will prevent that.
> >
> 
> Deal.  Though it would be nice to get that doc patch too :)

> > release the constructor rewrite and the doc improvements together
                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
I am confused...