[DBIx-Class-Devel] topic/rework_intro

[Peter Rabbitson]

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:28:38PM -0400, Brendan Byrd wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+dbic at rabbit.us>wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:59:58AM -0400, Brendan Byrd wrote:
> > > Topic branch ready for review.
> >
> > I have not looked neither at your diffs nor frew's comments yet. The
> > only note I have currenty - do not base work off other topic branches -
> > they are not guaranteed to be stable in any way. E.g. I will
> > *definitely* rebase topic/constructor rewrite because I have more stuff
> > that I forgot to put into 183458c6.
> >
> > No need to move your commits to master at this moment - we can
> > cherry-pick later. Just noting this for future reference.
> 
> 
> Normally, I wouldn't.  However, I was under the impression that
> constructor_rewrite was the new "bleeding edge" branch, so I wanted to make
> sure that I was basing the changes on the latest code.  I have a few
> branches like this (including my SS_DBD one), but it can be moved if
> necessary.

Right, master is the only thing against which new development is to be 
based. Anything else is unstable, and continuously rebased. We do not 
have enough dev-velocity to have a "stable" and a "current" etc. Abraxxa 
keeps promising he will write this down in a .pod, but it isn't 
happening...

I am traveling, will be back "normally" Mon, will share my concerns 
about SS_DBD then.

Cheers