[Dbix-class] Re: new name for "as"
Steven Mackenzie
dbix at aptile.co.uk
Fri Nov 3 10:55:11 GMT 2006
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Matt S Trout <dbix-class at trout.me.uk> [2006-11-03 09:50]:
>
>> Anybody got any suggestions on a new name? construct_as maybe?
>>
>
> `accessor_name`?
>
> Regards,
>
'accessor_name' isn't really appropriate becuase the docs state that no
actual accessor is created, and you must use ->get_column('<name>'.)
Although it would seem sensible to change the behaviour to create the
accessor wouldn't it? Is there a reason that no accessor is created at
the moment?
Or
'is':
$rs = $schema->resultset('Employee')->search(undef,
{
select => [ 'name', { count => 'employeeid' } ],
is => ['name', 'employee_count'],
});
'access_as':
$rs = $schema->resultset('Employee')->search(undef,
{
select => [ 'name', { count => 'employeeid' } ],
access_as => ['name', 'employee_count'],
});
'accessor': # with the appropriate change of behaviour
$rs = $schema->resultset('Employee')->search(undef,
{
select => [ 'name', { count => 'employeeid' } ],
accessor => ['name', 'employee_count'],
});
More information about the Dbix-class
mailing list