[Dbix-class] more newbie questions
Nigel Metheringham
nigel.metheringham at dev.intechnology.co.uk
Thu Feb 28 10:49:56 GMT 2008
On 28 Feb 2008, at 10:35, Dermot wrote:
> That does Nigel thanx. In the DB I am trying to design I can see
> lots of 1:M relationships but I can't see a case for using a join
> table. That's leading to me thinking that I am doing something wrong.
1:M doesn't need an additional table - M:M does.
Sometimes the link table may be disguised because its a useful entity
in its own right... ie it contains additional info with the
relationship.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham at InTechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
More information about the DBIx-Class
mailing list