[Dbix-class] more newbie questions

Nigel Metheringham nigel.metheringham at dev.intechnology.co.uk
Thu Feb 28 10:49:56 GMT 2008


On 28 Feb 2008, at 10:35, Dermot wrote:
> That does Nigel thanx. In the DB I am trying to design I can see  
> lots of 1:M relationships but I can't see a case for using a join  
> table. That's leading to me thinking that I am doing something wrong.


1:M doesn't need an additional table - M:M does.

Sometimes the link table may be disguised because its a useful entity  
in its own right...  ie it contains additional info with the  
relationship.

	Nigel.

--
[ Nigel Metheringham             Nigel.Metheringham at InTechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]






More information about the DBIx-Class mailing list