[Dbix-class] Scalar ref update()'s

Jose Fonseca zefonseca at gmail.com
Thu May 29 15:42:27 BST 2008


Hi, I hadn't gotten an ACK that this change would be committed, next time
I'll suggest a patch.

Regards,
Jose

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Ash Berlin <ash_cpan at firemirror.com>
wrote:

>
> On 29 May 2008, at 11:47, Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:
>
>  On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:25:33AM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 03:03:47PM -0300, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>>
>>>> I propose then this gets documented on some future revision, because
>>>> discard_changes does not sound like something that would refresh new
>>>> values.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Don't "propose this gets documented".
>>>
>>> Send a doc patch.
>>>
>>
>> I already sent Ash a small patch for the FAQ, based on what had
>> been discussed here, but I don't know if he did like it or not.
>> Having a second proposal probably won't hurt!
>>
>>
>>
> I applied the doc patch the other day - thanks.
>
> -ash
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
> IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
> SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
> Searchable Archive:
> http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.rawmode.org
>



-- =

http://zefonseca.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/attachments/20080529/9b9=
379db/attachment.htm


More information about the DBIx-Class mailing list