[Dbix-class] DBIx::Class::Tree::Fast

[fREW Schmidt]

>
> I note you use the term 'ascendants' which is not a real word and so would
> be confusing. Is this the same as 'ancestors'? If so then it would be best
> to use ancestors since that is a word know by other people and it keeps it
> consistent with other similar modules.
>

> Are you sure? I  found ascendant in Webster. Though i'm not a native
> English speaker, I was thinking it was more coherent to oppose with
> descendant. But it would be easy to fix that anyway.
>

For what it's worth I *am* a native English speaker and I think that
ancestors would be a lot more comprehensible.  I don't think I've ever heard
the word ascendants used...

-- =

fREW Schmidt
http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/attachments/20100804/435=
1d42a/attachment.htm