[Dbix-class] Re: Moose

Leandro Hermida softdev at leandrohermida.com
Fri Jul 9 12:44:50 GMT 2010


H all,

Sorry, I just noticed my post subject header was not really filled in
to summarize the conversation starter... let me change it to

 "can Moose + DBIx::Class provide an OO persistence framework and ORM
a la something like JPA?"

-L

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Leandro Hermida
<softdev at leandrohermida.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Been an avid DBIx::Class user for a long time and something I've been
> looking for on CPAN on and off also for a long time and thought maybe
> it would be possible now that Moose has made such an impact and good
> OO paradigm programming can be done in Perl... in Java EE (gasp!) you
> have such a thing as JPA, where you define in a standard way classes
> for your entity/data objects and via object/relational metadata
> (annotations in Java) define in these classes the relationships
> between the entities and any ORM mapping particulars that the
> underlying ORM engine should use. The underlying ORM transparently
> handles how the relational schema should map for the particular RDBMS
> being used and ones does queries in an object-centric way and also the
> ORM handles how this maps to the appropriate SQL for the schema, you
> get the idea.
>
> I always thought JPA was a nice concept since if one is doing OO
> programming this is the way one should be thinking about their data
> model. Now there are object persistence frameworks in Perl like e.g.
> KiokuDB but they don't do real ORM (unless I didn't read something
> right) and one might argue why do I need ORM and not just persist the
> objects in a store? There are many common reasons where ORM is
> required, off the top of my head the fact that commonly other systems
> will need to interact with your database and can only work with SQL
> and therefore need to see a proper relational data model. There are
> also other frameworks like Fey::ORM and Tangram but these seem
> dangerous to use in any serious project because they have the common
> CPAN problem that they don't have a big enough developer community
> behind it and/or aren't even really maintained or developed further
> anymore (no offense to the people behind these libraries at all, they
> are probably very nice frameworks, but you can understand how scary it
> can be to use something like this at work in a big project)
>
> Anyway sorry for the babble, is it possible with Moose and using
> DBIx::Class as the underlying ORM engine to create something a la JPA?
> Or will it be possible once DBIx::Class 0.09 series comes out and is
> more Moose-based?  I've looked through the archives and on googling
> and haven't really seen any clear approaches.
>
> best,
> Leandro
>



More information about the DBIx-Class mailing list