[Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

[Christian Walde]

On Mon, 03 Oct 2016 23:32:18 +0200, rabbit+dbic at <rabbit.us> wrote:

> Nevertheless, if nobody else finds this problematic: I will step aside
> and let an eager community, inadvertently suppressed all these years,
> steer this project further.

Honestly, if anything i'd love to see a solution that offends everyone
equally.

You preparing your feature-frozen-bugfix-only release in a different
namespace; mst's plan being used in the DBIx::Class namespace.

That way people who're worried can stick to a stable branch of dbic, and
people who actually need more from DBIc at some point in the future aren't
lost in limbo.

There's no need to deprive your stable-needing users of the work you had
planned to do, nor your far future users of a useful library, if both can
be served at the same time.

-- 
With regards,
Christian Walde