[Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

[Leo Lapworth]

On 4 October 2016 at 21:35, Christian Walde <walde.christian at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2016 23:32:18 +0200, rabbit+dbic at <rabbit.us> wrote:
>
>> Nevertheless, if nobody else finds this problematic: I will step aside
>> and let an eager community, inadvertently suppressed all these years,
>> steer this project further.
>
>
> Honestly, if anything i'd love to see a solution that offends everyone
> equally.
>
> You preparing your feature-frozen-bugfix-only release in a different
> namespace; mst's plan being used in the DBIx::Class namespace.
>
> That way people who're worried can stick to a stable branch of dbic, and
> people who actually need more from DBIc at some point in the future aren't
> lost in limbo.
>
> There's no need to deprive your stable-needing users of the work you had
> planned to do, nor your far future users of a useful library, if both can
> be served at the same time.

+1

Leo (Ranguard)