[Dbix-class] Clarification on the split-namespace proposal
Charlie Garrison
garrison at zeta.org.au
Wed Oct 26 20:20:09 GMT 2016
Good morning,
On 27 Oct 2016, at 0:50, Matthew Phillips wrote:
> So, given a choice between a proven quantity, and an unproven (and in
> Frew and I's opinion almost non-existent) quantity, it seems like
> the obvious choice for Peter to continue. The gratitude expressed for
> Peter's immense amount of work over the past few years from the users
> (and me) during these past few weeks points to this.
Thanks Matt. That’s what I’ve been thinking during this conversation
but wasn’t sure how to express it.
+1 Peter
Charlie
--
Charlie Garrison <garrison at zeta.org.au>
github.com/cngarrison metacpan.org/author/CNG
More information about the DBIx-Class
mailing list