[Dbix-class] Clarification on the split-namespace proposal

Charlie Garrison garrison at zeta.org.au
Wed Oct 26 20:20:09 GMT 2016


Good morning,

On 27 Oct 2016, at 0:50, Matthew Phillips wrote:

> So, given a choice between a proven quantity, and an unproven (and in 
> Frew and I's opinion almost  non-existent) quantity, it seems like 
> the obvious choice for Peter to continue. The gratitude expressed for 
> Peter's immense amount of work over the past few years from the users 
> (and me) during these past few weeks points to this. 

Thanks Matt. That’s what I’ve been thinking during this conversation 
but wasn’t sure how to express it.

+1 Peter

Charlie
-- 

    Charlie Garrison  <garrison at zeta.org.au>
    github.com/cngarrison   metacpan.org/author/CNG



More information about the DBIx-Class mailing list