[epo-core] List of supported projects

[Matt S Trout]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 01:11:10PM -0400, Stevan Little wrote:
> I have to agree with Jesse here, I think those three are core  
> projects and we all have our own pet projects (BP -> Jifty/Prophet,  
> Shadowcat -> Reaction, Infinity -> KiokuDB/Ernst, etc.) which are in  
> keeping with the goals of EPO, but should be separate from the core  
> list. I think EPO could still support these other projects publicly,  
> but just on a different level then Cat/DBIC/Moose.

Right. "projects we consider part of the enlightened perl movement", as
opposed to "flagship projects directly supported by EPO". 

I sort of wonder if we should try and put Module::Install onto there so we
can put some money into getting that stabler, saner and better documented.

I also think that perigrin's start towards an extended core, Task::Kensho,
should become a key thing somehow. Having EPO have An Opinion about things
is probably important (which is why Jifty is probably better in group 2)

-- 
      Matt S Trout       Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
   Technical Director                    http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
 Shadowcat Systems Ltd.  Want a managed development or deployment platform?
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/            http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/