[Epo-ec-advisors] Some thoughts on areas to address in the EC

[Adam Kennedy]

2009/7/17 Matt S Trout <m.trout at shadowcat.co.uk>:
> And, of course, the difference here is we don't need consensus that a
> particular way is -best-, only that it's -popular- and -good-. This has to
> be an exercise in shipping rather than one in perfectionism.

Correct.

However...

I may be reading people wrong, but I do think I'm already seeing the
emergence of similar tendencies.

"On top of that, I'm working on MQI (Message Queue Interface),
which is intended to be DBI for messaging with a standard API via a
factory class and MQD (driver) layers on top of each protocol. Thoughts?
Does that sound like a good way forward?"

This line of thought can quickly become "And we should build it and
bundle it into the core"

Adam K

(Apologies if joining mid-thread has got me talking at cross-purposes)