[Epo-members-announce] Adding Padre, the Perl IDE as and EPO
project
James Mastros
james at mastros.biz
Mon Feb 15 12:46:15 GMT 2010
(Note: I'm a special member. As such, my vote doesn't actually count.)
I was going to vote a guarded yey. As new information comes in, this
has become an abstain. I think that a hand-holding editor would be a
great thing to perl. I think that Padre isn't the perlish way to do
it, neccessarly. I see a lot of attempt at deep integration --
building an editor in perl, and a collection of tools built to work
inside of it, and, Gabor suggests, a framework for writing
applications that is integrated with the editor... the middle one
worries me, and the last is just a step too far.
I think an editor in perl is a good idea. I also think that better
perl tools for emacs, and for vi, are good ideas. I think that a
framework for writing desktop applications is a good idea -- but I
absolutely don't want one that treats any editor as a neccessary
component! (Not even if it was my preferred editor, and I don't think
that Padre will ever become my preferred editor -- I like screen too
much to use a GUI editor again.
I think Strawberry's strength is that it is a distribution of perl,
first and foremost. You don't have a normal perl way to do things and
a strawberry way, you make the normal perl way to do things Just Work
under strawberry. That is a great thing, but what I see going on here
is not that thing.
-=- James Mastros,
theorbtwo
More information about the Epo-members-announce
mailing list