[Fwd: Re: [html-formfu] RFC - Transactions for DBIC updates]

[Moritz Onken]

If you have any questions regarding git catch me on irc or see here: https://learn.github.com/

cheers,

moritz

Am 11.09.2009 um 01:00 schrieb Mario Minati:

> Hi Moritz,
>
> due to my enormous experience with github it may take some. I'll try  
> one the weeknd, but cannot promise yet.
>
>
> Greets,
>
> Mario
>
>
> Moritz Onken schrieb:
>> Hi Mario,
>>
>> this a good idea. I was thinking about it anyway. Go ahead and add  
>> it to the (github) repo.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> moritz
>>
>> Am 09.09.2009 um 23:07 schrieb Mario Minati:
>>
>>> Hi Moritz,
>>>
>>> I now found out, that Cx::C::ExtJS::REST invokes DBIC update  
>>> itself, so I've to move the transaction calls there.
>>>
>>> I hope thats ok for you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Greets,
>>>
>>> Mario Minati
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>>> Betreff:     Re: [html-formfu] RFC - Transactions for DBIC updates
>>> Datum:     Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:10:31 +0200
>>> Von:     Mario Minati <mario.minati at googlemail.com>
>>> An:     HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework <html-formfu at lists.scsys.co.uk 
>>> >
>>> Referenzen:     <4A9E60BA.2040001 at googlemail.com> <42736BA0-A63A-461A-8DA6-6FFFA64CB2A0 at houseofdesign.de 
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Moritz,
>>>
>>> I need transactions for my catalystx::controller::extjs::rest  
>>> derived classes, so I have no control over the line that calls  
>>> update.
>>> And I thought it would be me more usefull to put the code into  
>>> model::dbic than into extjs::rest.
>>>
>>> Greets,
>>>
>>> Mario
>>>
>>> Moritz Onken schrieb:
>>>> Hi Mario,
>>>>
>>>> as far as I remember nested transactions result in a noop. Which  
>>>> means you can nest transactions and nothing bad will happen.
>>>>
>>>> Other than that: what's wrong with $schema->txn_do { $form->model- 
>>>> >update } ?
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>>
>>>> moritz
>>>>
>>>> Am 02.09.2009 um 14:10 schrieb Mario Minati:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi @all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I need to use transactions for all my db update and create  
>>>>> actions. Currently FF:M:DBIC doesn't support this. I'd like to  
>>>>> extend the update method to start a transaction, if an attribute  
>>>>> is defined (e.g. 'use_transaction').
>>>>> To avoid nested transactions, as update is also called  
>>>>> internally, I would introduce a class variable which stores our  
>>>>> transaction state.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you agree with that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Greets,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mario
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> HTML-FormFu mailing list
>>>> HTML-FormFu at lists.scsys.co.uk
>>>> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> HTML-FormFu mailing list
>>> HTML-FormFu at lists.scsys.co.uk
>>> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HTML-FormFu mailing list
>> HTML-FormFu at lists.scsys.co.uk
>> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HTML-FormFu mailing list
> HTML-FormFu at lists.scsys.co.uk
> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu