[Xml-compile] Is XML::Compile the right tool for writing a
SOAP server?
Mark Overmeer
mark at overmeer.net
Sat Mar 21 20:25:09 GMT 2009
* Petar Shangov (pshangov at yahoo.com) [090321 15:57]:
> I spent some time yesterday studying the examples and testing
> XML::Compile::SOAP::Daemon. I got stuck at one point where XML::C:S was
> looking for an 'element' in my wsdl message definition where I had a
> 'type' instead (I am writing from home now and I do not have the code
> in front of me so I cannot be more specific ...) Does XML::C:S have a
> specific preference for document-style soap or does it tolerate rpc as
> well (my current wsdl is based on the older wsdl for the SOAP-Lite based
> service so it is rpc-literal)?
Are you using the latest 2.* versions?
Send me what you try, and I will take a look at it. I may learn your
needs, and therewith improve the implementation and/or documentation.
> Furthermore, this is a milti-user application and I do not know how
> well Net::Daemon can scale for multiple users compared to apache.
Probably Net::Daemon is more straight-forward so faster. Depends on what
you configure. It is quite easy to merge tasks in any daemon.
> Anyway, at the end of the day I decided to try to use SOAP::Lite for
> the soap layer, and have XML::C handle only the serialization of perl
> data to XML.
Then you have to maintain two large modules.
> There is also SOAP::WSDL, which I have yet to look at.
SOAP::WSDL has many limitations (have used [and rewritten] it intensively)
Its successor is better: SOAP::WSDL2.
--
Regards,
MarkOv
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Overmeer MSc MARKOV Solutions
Mark at Overmeer.net solutions at overmeer.net
http://Mark.Overmeer.net http://solutions.overmeer.net
More information about the Xml-compile
mailing list