[Catalyst] old versions of Catalyst on CPAN
Sebastian Riedel
sri-lists at oook.de
Sun Dec 3 10:49:53 GMT 2006
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> The question I have is why are you linking to Catalyst 3.00?
It's not.
> If there's
> something you want to point to from another document (resume? blog?), then
> perhaps you should just post it on your own website? Then you can put it in
> a "look at this code I wrote, it's interesting" context instead of "download
> this, newbie!" context.
Because i don't want to break existing links and cpansearch just works,
no need for me to reinvent that wheel.
> The CPAN is about community, so it's better to
> respect the wishes of the community rather than your own personal tastes.
>
If the CPAN community is so concerned about this, why is versioning
still a feature?
As long as it's there i will make use of it.
> I personally consider having any version other than the latest available on
> CPAN a bug. I don't want to waste the mirror's space (these people are
> mirroring CPAN for free; I want it to be easy for them), nor do I want to
> confuse people looking for the version they should be starting with.
Maybe you should take a look at the cpan mirrors, quite a lot only keep
the most recent versions anyway.
> Advanced users know to look for old versions on the backpan.
Backpan != CPAN-Search
> Readers of your
> blog or whatever would appreciate that you just cite code in an inline
> snippet rather than via a link to the CPAN. Everyone wins. :
You don't know all my readers personally, do you?
P.S.: You didn't answer the question from my previous post, why should i
nuke my cpan directory just because you made a naming mistake?
--
sebastian
More information about the Catalyst
mailing list