[Catalyst] Engine::AJP or Engine::WARP

[Matt S Trout]

On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 12:23:00PM -0500, Andrew Libby wrote:
> Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> 
> >I would think SCGI would be an easier option, given that there's
> >already a perl module for handling the protocol.  I've even got a
> >half-finished Engine::SCGI that does everything but handle POST
> >arguments.
> >
> >Mike
> >  
> >
> Hi Mike,
> 
> How mature is the apache module side of this?  This looks very
> interesting.  I'm attracted to
> the idea of not having perl run within Apache. 

FastCGI already works beautifully. What advantages does SCGI have over this?

-- 
     Matt S Trout       Offering custom development, consultancy and support
  Technical Director    contracts for Catalyst, DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact
Shadowcat Systems Ltd.  mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for more information

 + Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +