[Catalyst] [announce] Catalyst 5.70 developer release.

[Krzysztof Krzyżaniak]

Matt S Trout <dbix-class at trout.me.uk> writes:

[..]
>> for example: first 5.6902, then 5.70_1 then 5.70. From debian point of
>> view 5.70 is before 5.6902, 5.70_1 is invalid (so probably should be
>> changed to 5.70.01 but then it's after 5.70 so probably should be changed
>> into 5.69-5.70pre1 etc.). But this is minor problem, it's only make
>> automatic tools blind but always can be changed manualy.
>
> 5.70_01 IS A DEV RELEASE. So you don't want to be packaging it anyway.
>
> The _ is required for CPAN to understand it's a dev release. If you want a 
> different format, feel free to convince the CPAN admins to change that.

I know and I don't want to change it.

>>> The next production release will be 5.7000 - what's the problem with that?
>> 
>> But will be tar.gz named Catalyst-Runtime-5.70.tar.gz or
>> Catalyst-Runtime-5.7000.tar.gz? It makes difference with automatic
>> upgradind tools.
>
> 5.7000 - dists will be Dist-Name-<version>.tar.gz just like they've always 
> been, just like every dist installer I've ever used (i.e. EUMM, MI, MB) builds 
> them.
>
> Relax, don't try to package the dev releases, the production release which 
> actually needs packaging will be fine.

I package everything (because I like to have clean system) but I don't
upload to debian everything :>

  eloy
-- 
-------e-l-o-y----------------------------e-l-o-y- at -k-o-f-e-i-n-a-.-n-e-t------

       jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej